Skip to main content

HCS-6 Standard: Dynamic Hashinals

Status: Published

Table of Contents

Authors

Additional Authors

Abstract

This standard is a sub-standard of HCS-2 which introduces a way to inscribe and tokenize Hashinals whose metadata can be updated at a whim by utilizing a non-indexed Topic ID. The latest message points to the current metadata for an NFT.

Motivation

Creators of NFT Collections, sometimes desire the ability to change the metadata of an NFT, for example in cases of:

  • correcting mistakes in metadata during initial inscription
  • providing holders with new variations of artwork / attributes over time
  • updating numerical stats from leveling up or down during a game

The list above is non-exhaustive and can be expanded to many use cases.

Specification

HCS-6 is largely built on top of HCS-2 which describes how Advanced Topic Registries work. Please read that document for further clarity.

Creating a Dynamic Hashinal involves four steps.

  1. Creating a valid, non-indexed HCS-6 Topic ID
  2. Minting a new Serial Number on a Token ID following the Metadata format
  3. Creating a valid HCS-1 Topic ID
  4. Submitting a valid message to the HCS-6 Topic ID with the HCS-1 file.

Steps 2-4 can be repeated every time the NFT will be updated.

Creating an HCS-6 Topic ID

The memo field for Dynamic Hashinals must follow this format to be valid.

hcs-6:non-indexed:{ttl}

The only variable element in the memo would be the ttl field. We suggest a longer ttl as this is the time in seconds that gateways and clients will store the previous version of your metadata in their cache. In the future, gateways and clients may decide to prioritize Topics with longer metadata by imposing fees, introducing rate limits, etc. The minimum ttl must be 3600 (1 hour) to be valid, and the suggested minimum would be 86400 (1 day)

Metadata

Dynamic Hashinals follow all of the same rules described in HCS-5, with one main exception being that they will utilize the HCS-6 hcsStandard instead of HCS-1. The resulting HRL minted onto a serial number includes the protocol number 6

The format of the metadata on a dynamic Hashinal is as follows:

hcs://6/{topicId}

topicId is a valid HCS-6 Registry Topic ID in which data for this NFT will be or is written to.

The purpose of including the file standard in the HRL is to enable client applications to make logical decisions based on its existence. For example:

  • a client might decide to use a different gateway to load immutable (HCS-5) versus Dynamic (HCS-6) Hashinals without needing to load the memo for each topic.
  • analytics and indexer applications can search for all NFTs that include a HCS-6 HRL.

Submitting Messages

In a non-indexed Topic ID, the most recent register operation is the current pointer for your metadata. You can submit a new message to update the metadata within the ttl specified on the memo of your HCS-6 Topic ID.

Each message follows this format.

{
"p": "hcs-6",
"op": "register",
// the HCS-1 Topic ID
"t_id": "0.0.12345",
"m": "Season 2 update for the Hashinal Hounds",
}

Clients, dApps, gateways, etc, will read the most recent sequence number's t_id to locate the current metadata of this Dynamic Hashinal

Validation

Dynamic Hashinals are only valid when

  • Their HCS-6 Topic ID is non-indexed
  • The latest message in the HCS-6 Topic ID has a valid HCS-1 Topic ID for the t_id field
  • They specify a ttl that is at least 3600 (1 hour)
  • It is created after 1713886229389232400 nanosecond timestamp

Limitations

While HCS-6 is built on HCS-2, it includes some important limitations to improve UX.

  1. Inscribed messages cannot utilize recursion in submitted messages to the registry. For example, the following would be invalid
{
"p": "hcs-6",
"op": "register",
// an HCS-6 Topic ID
"t_id": "0.0.12345",
"m": "Pointing metadata to another registry.",
}
  1. HCS-6 will always use a non-indexed Topic ID. update and delete operations will not be valid.

Conclusion

HCS-6 clearly defines how to inscribe Dynamic Hashinals on the Hedera Hashgraph utilizing the Consensus Service. Note, to avoid all doubt, operations and functionality not written within this standard are invalid and should not be assumed.